Small molecules are some of the most valuable—and most difficult—targets in molecular recognition. They include metabolites, drugs, toxins, cofactors, and signaling compounds that often weigh only a few hundred Daltons. Developing expertise in aptamers to small molecules means mastering a set of selection and validation strategies that differ substantially from protein-target aptamer work, because small molecules offer fewer contact points, weaker “handles” for separation, and more ways to generate false positives. This article explains how small-molecule aptamers are discovered, why selection is uniquely challenging, how advanced SELEX variants improve success rates, and what “good” looks like when you engineer an aptamer into a sensor, assay, or therapeutic concept. 1) What makes small-molecule aptamers special? Aptamers are single-stranded DNA or RNA sequences that fold into 3D shapes able to bind a target through non-covalent interactions—hydrogen bonding, π–π stacking, electrostatics, and shape complementarity. For proteins, large surfaces provide many contacts, so binding can be robust even when the selection workflow is imperfect. Small molecules are different: Tiny binding interface: fewer interaction opportunities means affinity can be harder to evolve and easier to mis-measure. Separation is tricky: in classic SELEX you often immobilize the target; immobilization can change the target’s presentation…
Aptamers—short, single-stranded DNA or RNA oligonucleotides that fold into target-binding structures—are attractive tools for therapeutics, diagnostics, and biosensing. But one limitation shows up again and again in real-world use: stability. In biological fluids, aptamers can be degraded by nucleases, lose their functional conformation, or get cleared rapidly due to small size. “Enhancing aptamer stability” therefore means engineering aptamers to retain integrity and function under the conditions they must actually operate in—serum, cells, elevated temperatures, long storage, or repeated assay cycles. This article explains the major stability failure modes and the best-established enhancement strategies—organized the way practitioners typically make design decisions. 1) What “Aptamer Stability” Really Means (It’s Not One Thing) When people say “aptamer stability,” they often blend multiple properties: Nuclease stability (biostability): resistance to DNases/RNases in serum, plasma, and tissues. Structural/conformational stability: ability to keep the correct fold that binds the target (especially under ionic changes, crowding, or temperature shifts). Thermal stability: higher melting temperature (Tₘ) and robust folding across a wider temperature range. Circulation stability (pharmacokinetic stability): staying in the bloodstream long enough to matter—often limited by renal filtration for small oligos. Functional stability: maintaining binding affinity/specificity after modifications, storage, repeated use, or immobilization. A…
Aptamers are short, single-stranded nucleic acids—typically ~20–100 nucleotides—that fold into defined 3D shapes and bind targets (proteins, small molecules, ions, cells) with high affinity and specificity. They are often described as “chemical antibodies,” but they behave differently: their binding comes from nucleic-acid folding + surface complementarity, and their performance is tightly linked to sequence chemistry, structure, and degradation pathways. When your core question is “DNA aptamers or RNA aptamers?”, the best answer is not a slogan. It’s a decision based on (1) structural needs, (2) stability environment, (3) manufacturability, (4) modification strategy, and (5) application constraints. 1) The Fundamental Difference: Structural Vocabulary vs Environmental Toughness RNA aptamers: richer folding vocabulary RNA has a 2′-OH group on the ribose, which expands hydrogen-bonding possibilities and supports a larger “structural vocabulary” (hairpins, internal loops, bulges, pseudoknots, complex tertiary contacts). In practice, this often means more diverse and intricate 3D conformations, which can translate into excellent binding performance for some targets. Takeaway: Choose RNA when the target demands highly nuanced shape recognition (e.g., challenging protein surfaces or structured RNA targets). DNA aptamers: generally more chemically stable and simpler DNA lacks the 2′-OH group and is typically more resistant to base-catalyzed…
Aptamers are short single-stranded DNA or RNA molecules that fold into 3D structures capable of binding targets (proteins, small molecules, cells, or even complex particles) with high specificity and affinity. “Aptamer methods” usually refers to the full pipeline: library design → selection (SELEX) → enrichment monitoring → sequencing & bioinformatics → candidate optimization → biophysical/functional validation → stability engineering. Modern platforms improve speed and hit quality by combining smarter selection pressures with microfluidics and next-generation sequencing. 1) Core Aptamer Selection Method: SELEX (Systematic Evolution of Ligands by EXponential Enrichment) 1.1 Classical SELEX workflow (baseline method) Start with a random oligonucleotide library (often 10^13–10^15 unique sequences) Incubate library with the target Partition bound vs unbound sequences Elute binders Amplify (PCR for DNA; RT-PCR + transcription for RNA) Repeat iterative rounds with increasing stringency until enrichment is achieved Why it works: each round increases the fraction of sequences that can bind under the imposed conditions (buffer, temperature, competitor molecules, etc.). Why it’s hard: classical SELEX can be slow, labor intensive, and prone to amplification bias—hence the rise of “advanced SELEX” platforms. 1.2 “Stringency engineering” (how you make aptamers useful) Selection success often depends less on the target itself…
