Aptamers are short, single-stranded nucleic acid molecules (DNA or RNA) that fold into specific 3D shapes and bind targets with high affinity and selectivity—often compared to how antibodies recognize antigens, but built from nucleic acids rather than proteins.
Unlike a “generic DNA strand,” an aptamer’s function comes from structure: loops, stems, bulges, pseudoknots, and other motifs that create a binding surface matching a target’s geometry and chemistry. Targets can include proteins, peptides, small molecules, ions, and even whole cells (depending on the selection strategy).
Aptamers are often described as “chemical antibodies,” but the differences are exactly why they’re valuable.
Low immunogenicity (reduced risk of provoking immune responses)
High stability and the ability to refold after denaturation in many cases
Easy chemical synthesis (batch consistency, scalable manufacturing)
Straightforward modification (labels, linkers, immobilization handles)
Nuclease sensitivity (especially RNA aptamers) can be a limitation in biological fluids unless stabilized.
Selection bias can occur during discovery (e.g., PCR bias), meaning “best in the tube” isn’t always “best in reality.”
Very high affinity does not automatically guarantee best real-world specificity; selection conditions matter.
Aptamers are typically 20–100+ nucleotides (varies by design and downstream needs). The sequence forms intramolecular base-pairing, creating secondary/tertiary structures. Binding arises from:
Shape complementarity (a pocket fitting a small molecule, or a surface matching a protein epitope)
Electrostatics (nucleic acids are negatively charged; ions and buffer conditions strongly influence binding)
Hydrogen bonding & stacking interactions (especially for aromatic small molecules)
A useful mental model: sequence → fold → binding surface → target recognition. This “folded recognition” is why two sequences of the same length can behave completely differently.
SELEX stands for Systematic Evolution of Ligands by EXponential Enrichment. It’s an in vitro selection method that starts with a huge random oligonucleotide library and iteratively enriches sequences that bind a chosen target.
SELEX mimics natural selection but on molecules:
Start with a diverse pool (often up to ~10^15 sequence variants in concept, though practical coverage is limited)
Keep what binds
Amplify what you kept
Repeat with higher stringency until winners dominate
A typical library contains:
A random region (the “search space”)
Constant flanking regions (primer sites for amplification)
Why it matters: the random region explores structure space, while primer regions enable iterative enrichment.
Before selection, the pool is often heated and cooled to encourage stable folding.
Why it matters: binding is structure-dependent; folding protocol affects what shapes exist.
Targets may be immobilized (beads, columns, filters) or presented in formats that allow separation of bound vs unbound.
Why it matters: immobilization can accidentally mask binding sites, especially for small molecules.
Unbound sequences are washed away; bound sequences are retained and then eluted.
Why it matters: partition efficiency largely controls enrichment speed and quality.
DNA SELEX: PCR amplification
RNA SELEX: reverse transcription → PCR → transcription back to RNA (common pattern)
Stringency can be increased by lowering target concentration, increasing wash intensity, adding competitors, or tightening buffer constraints—so only the strongest/specific binders survive.
Modern workflows often add sequencing to track enrichment and support rational optimization, plus truncation and chemical stabilization steps. Next-generation SELEX platforms also aim to improve speed, precision, and throughput.
Aptamers can bind the “wrong” things: bead surfaces, linkers, similar molecules, or cell components. Counter-SELEXadds a step where you remove sequences that bind unwanted targets or matrices, improving specificity.
This is crucial when:
your target is structurally similar to other molecules,
your target must be recognized in complex mixtures,
or your assay has many potential nonspecific binding surfaces.
To overcome limitations of traditional workflows, many enhanced approaches exist:
Cell-SELEX (select aptamers against whole cells to capture native surface targets)
Capillary electrophoresis SELEX (CE-SELEX) (high-resolution partitioning)
Microfluidic SELEX (automation, reduced sample, faster cycles)
High-throughput sequencing–assisted SELEX (better visibility into enrichment trajectories)
In vivo SELEX (selection under more physiological constraints)
The trend is clear: improved partitioning + better readouts = more efficient discovery.
One common challenge is maintaining binding and stability under real conditions (serum, temperature variation, nucleases). Chemical modification can:
improve nuclease resistance
expand chemical diversity for stronger or more selective binding
adjust hydrophobicity or other physical properties
Importantly, modification can be introduced during SELEX (modified libraries) or after selection (post-SELEX optimization).
Aptamers show up wherever molecular recognition is needed:
Diagnostics & biosensing (aptamer-based capture, signal transduction platforms)
Therapeutics & targeted delivery (binding a disease-associated target to modulate or deliver)
Bioprocessing & purification (selective capture/release concepts)
Basic research tools (affinity reagents, imaging tags, conformational switches)
Their appeal comes from the combination of programmability (sequence-defined) and manufacturability (chemical synthesis).
“Binds in buffer A, fails in buffer B”: binding can be salt- and ion-dependent; choose selection buffers that resemble real use conditions.
“Great affinity, mediocre specificity”: add counter-selection and realistic competitors.
“Winner sequences don’t translate to short formats”: plan for truncation; verify the binding core.
“Selection gets stuck”: consider better partitioning methods (CE, microfluidics) or sequencing-guided decisions.
Screening of aptamers and their potential application in targeted diagnosis and therapy of liver cancer
Aptamer Screening- Current Methods and Future Trend towards Non-SELEX Approach
Aptamer Discovery Platform
Aptamer Screening Services for Peptide
selexkmdbio-Cell Nucleic Acid Aptamer Screening Service
Current Status and Future Directions of Aptamer Development
Major Application Fields of Aptamers
Key Characteristics and Working Principle of Aptamers
aptamer
Aptamer screening via SELEX for molecular recognition
APTAMER SCREENING METHODS
Aptamer screening technologies
Toggle-SELEX Aptamer Screening Service
Negative Aptamer Selection- A Practical Guide to Improving Aptamer Specificity in SELEX
selexkmdbio-Cell Nucleic Acid Aptamer Screening Service
Aptamer Screening- Current Methods and Future Trend towards Non-SELEX Approach
Aptamer Screening Service-Subtractive SELEX
Aptamer Screening Service-Counter SELEX
Aptamer Screening Service-HT-SELEX
Aptamer Screening Service-NGS-SELEX
Aptamer Screening Service-Multi-Round SELEX Screening
Whole Cell-SELEX Aptamer Screening Service
Membrane Protein Aptamer Screening Service
Aptamer Screening Service for Drug Discovery
Aptamer Live Cell SELEX Service
Classical SELEX Service for Aptamer
Aptamer Selection and Identification
Aptamer Screening Process and Applications Overview